.NET Architects Club

.NET Architects Club is for .NET developers moving into architecture. Build production-grade systems.

Why you should join: Courses on modularising the monolith and deploying .NET apps to Azure, plus direct access to the host for architecture questions. Free to join, with paid tiers for deeper support.

The one-liner

A freemium club for.NET developers working towards software architect roles.

What they actually sell

.NET Architects Club, run by Milan Jovanovic, lives on Skool. Its public pitch: "The bridge from Developer to Architect." A free tier sits at the front door, with Premium upgrades whose prices are not shown on the public page. The page lists the most practical community for engineers who want to build production-grade systems, private Community of like-minded.NET engineers, Upcoming courses as they ship, and Heads up: source code + early video access is coming. Membership price will increase when it lands. Inside sit 2 courses. A formal money-back promise is not spelled out on the about page.

Who pays and why

Builders and operators who feel behind on AI and do not want another tool graveyard. The fear is peers shipping while they still prompt in circles. They join for proven workflows and a practice room for applied AI.

Where the members come from

Milan Jovanovic's YouTube, Facebook, LinkedIn, X and website presence appears to feed the room. The Skool community reads as the member back end for people already drawn to that work. Exact follower counts stay off the public page.

What's holding it back

AI rooms age in weeks. If workflows go stale, members who paid for edge will leave.

Steal this

Sell AI community as weekly workflows members can run, not a tool directory.

Would this work in another niche?

Yes for other applied AI practice communities. Weak for prompt dump channels.